Software Vault: The Gold Collection/Software Vault - The Gold Collection (American Databankers) (1993).ISO/cdr20/amrd2.zip/RENE2.TXT

Text File | 1993-06-20 | 7KB | 110 lines

         Cogito Ergo Sum: Descartes' Proof of the human soul.
                         By: Andy Montgomery
                     E-mail Exec-PC: (414)-789-4210


        I really have a new appreciation for just how much I don't know after
reading Descartes' "Part Four:  Proofs of the Existence of God and the Human
Soul" from *Discourse on Method*.  I mean, Descartes was about the age I am
now when he wrote this.  FER' GOD'S SAKE!  My greatest accomplishments to date
consist of having one of my poems published in Fish-Rap .  Oh well, some
people are just over-achievers.  I spent most of my twenty-fourth year going
to clubs to see or work with rock and blues bands.  Rene' Descartes spent his
proving the existence of himself, God, and the soul; did a spiffy job of it,
too.
     After a skillful placation of the church in line one of the introductory
paragraph, Descartes sets a straight course into the "heart of an
impenetrable darkness", as it were: what is truth?  He reasoned that
throughout the course of history, philosophers have sat around and tried to
define truth, but nobody ever hit a home-run.  Descartes looked at it and
said, in effect: "That's too hard--plus, it hasn't worked so far.  It would
be easier to define what truth isn't.  Get rid of all that stuff, and what's
left over must be truth."
     To do this, Descartes started doubting everything... kinda.  He was
working within the following guideline:  if it's true, it will be obviously
so, and cannot be doubted.  So, try and doubt it.  If you can, then it ain't
truth!
        His first doubt was his senses:  "Thus, as our senses deceive us at
times [are doubtable], I was ready to suppose that nothing was at all the way
our senses represented them to be."  That ruled out everything that he could
observe.
     Next, he put the kibosh on prior human reason:  "As there are men who
make mistakes in reasoning even on the simplest topics... I judged that I was
as liable to error as any other, and rejected as false all the reasoning which
I had previously accepted as valid demonstration."  Descartes here says that
because he's no better than any other guy, he has the same chance to screw up
and therefore must doubt his ability to hold as certain anything that he has
been shown to be true.  This must be done due to his own chance to error as
well as other people's.
     Finally, Descartes wound up doubting all of reality: "As the same
precepts which we have when awake may come to us when asleep without their
being true, I decided to suppose that nothing that had ever entered my mind
was more real than the illusion of my dreams."  More simply put:  you can
doubt the ability of the human mind, because it too can fool you.  You can
always ask yourself, "Is this reality, or just a dream?"  If it has any doubt,
then it can't be a certainty.
     Well then, WHAT  IN THE HELL IS LEFT?  Descartes crap-canned the whole
shootin' match!  Everything that can be observed, thought, or reasoned is
doubtable and must be tossed out the window in the search for 100% certainty.
But there is something left, of course...
     COLLEGE-TOE AIRHEAD SOUP!  Great with pumpernickel (jk).  Descartes hit
upon the biggie.  After all of this doubting, the one thing that could not be
doubted was that he was the thing that was doing the doubting.  This was the
bottom floor of the building.  The foundation.  He was undoubtedly thinking
[ergo] he was undoubtedly existing:


       But I soon noticed that while I thus wished to think everything
     false, it was necessarily true that I who thought so was something.
     Since this truth, I think, therefore I am, was so firm and assured
     that all the most extravagant suppositions of the sceptics were
     unable to shake it, I judged that I could safely accept it as the
     first principal of the philosophy I was seeking.


     Now we're cookin'!  Descartes knew with 100% certainty that he was a
thinking thing that existed.  But what kind of thing was he?  This is the
other humongo point to Descartes' terrifyingly simple writings.  He states
that while he can easily imagine that he had no physical nature, and even
that no physical universe even existed,  he could never imagine that he had
no ability to think.  Just by the simple fact that he was trying to imagine
his body with no mind, he proved to himself over and over that he was
thinking.  Cool, eh?  Kind of like a mental Chinese finger-prison:  the harder
you think about not being able to think, the more you prove to yourself that
you're thinking.  This little concept has come to be known as Descartes'
Mind/Body Dichotomy:


       ...therefore I concluded that I was a substance whose whole
     essence or nature was only to think, and which, to exist, has
     no need of space nor of any material thing.  Thus it follows
     that this ego, this soul, by which I am what I am, is entirely
     distinct from the body and is easier to know than the latter,
     and that even if the body were not, the soul would not cease
     to be all that it now is.


     This distinction between the psyche and the body finally freed the
scientific world from the oppression of the church.  Now all of the scientists
could say "No, no... I'm only examining the physical stuff around me.  I'm not
trying to knock God or anything like that.  All I'm doing is having a look
around!"  These two differences--the mind and the body--are the melons that
Descartes dreamed of.
     Finally, since Descartes had so much fun finding this truth, Cogito Ergo
Sum, he wanted to be able to recognize other truths that he might come across
in order to build his new personal philosophy.  But how could he do it? you
ask yourself.  (Well, you might not ask that, but other people do...)  He
reasoned that if the statement "I think, therefore I am" is true because it's
the simplest of statements and can't be doubted, then any statement that is as
simple and doubtless as that statement must be true.  Cogito Ergo Sum could
now be employed as a measuring stick to find true statements.
     All in all, it still blows my melon to think that Descartes came up with
this stuff while he was barely out of his philosophical diapers.  It makes me
wonder about philosophy as a whole.  I mean, we had a lot of philosophy before
that, and then this young punk comes along and proves that he exists and that
he has a soul and that he can think and all of that cool stuff.  If he could
do that, does that mean that we could get another Descartes coming along some
day telling us that we don't exist?

     The future is the youth...